- 54% of adults endorsed genetic testing even if no effective treatment is available.
- 38% of parents were willing to have their children's DNA stored in a government biobank.
- Adults were more likely to store DNA in a government biobank if they support genetic testing for diseases despite the lack of available effective treatment.
Genetic tests are an exciting new tool in health care, but they raise many questions. With a few drops of blood, a genetic test can show if an individual has specific genes that may increase the chance of developing certain diseases. If doctors identify individuals who have disease-causing genes, sometimes they can offer earlier, effective treatment – even if no cure exists.
More genetic tests are becoming available, raising questions about who should be tested, whether tests should be done when no effective treatment exists, and whether the US government should store citizens’ DNA for research. Genetic testing also raises concerns about the privacy of a person’s health information and the potential for discrimination based upon test results.
Advances in genetic testing have led to the idea of DNA biobanks. A biobank is a collection of DNA from a group of individuals in the population, linked to other information about health such as medical records. DNA biobanks will allow the government to track health data, and to contact individuals in the future when new treatment and prevention strategies become available. The United Kingdom has recently established a national government-sponsored DNA biobank, and as a result has identified important genes related to diabetes and Crohn’s disease. The Genomics and Personalized Medicine Act, introduced in Congress in August 2006, proposes a similar government-sponsored DNA biobank in the United States.
It is unclear how the US population feels about a DNA biobank, or how the public’s general attitudes about genetic testing might influence public biobank support. The C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health asked adults about their willingness to store their own or their child’s DNA in a governmentsponsored DNA biobank. The Poll also examined the public’s attitudes toward genetic testing for both adults and children.
When Should Genetic Testing Be Done?
Experts in genetic testing and medical ethics disagree about whether genetic testing should be done for a disease when no effective treatment exists. The National Poll on Children’s Health asked respondents their opinion about genetic testing of children and adults in situations when effective treatments do or do not exist. Of respondents with an opinion, the majority (54%) endorsed genetic testing even if no effective treatment is available, while 39% of adults thought that genetic testing should be done only when effective treatment is available (Figure 1).
Opinions about genetic testing differed by respondents’ race/ethnicity. Whites were evenly divided about whether genetic testing should be done, depending upon whether an effective treatment exists. In contrast, non-whites were more likely to support genetic testing even if no effective treatment were available. Otherwise, there were no differences in attitudes about genetic testing by age, gender, education, income or health insurance status.
Likely Participation in a Government DNA Biobank
Poll respondents were asked to imagine that a genetic test exists for a disease without a current treatment. Parents were asked whether they would store their child’s DNA in government-sponsored DNA biobank, in case future treatments become available.
Thirty-eight percent of parents were willing to have their children’s DNA stored in a government DNA biobank (Figure 2). Parents’ willingness to have their children’s DNA stored in a biobank was not related to children’s health status. Overall, 38% of adults (with and without children) were willing to store their own DNA in a biobank. These findings were similar for respondents across all age groups, gender, race/ethnicity and education.
Most parents (82%) were consistent in their attitudes – whether positive or negative – about storing their own and their children’s DNA.
Of note, adults who favored genetic testing when an effective treatment is not available were more likely to say they would store their DNA in a government biobank (72%) than adults who favored genetic testing only with available effective treatments or not at all (28%). Similarly, parents who favored genetic testing when an effective treatment is not available were more likely to say they would store their children’s DNA in a government biobank (62%) than parents who favored genetic testing only with available effective treatments or not at all (38%).
In this nationwide household poll, we found that 38% of the US public is willing to have DNA (whether their own or their children’s) stored in a government-sponsored biobank. The potential for biobanks to alert individuals with risks for genetic disorders and connect them with early prevention and treatment options depends a great deal on the breadth of public participation. These findings therefore raise the question: Would participation of 38% of the population be enough to make a biobank successful, in terms of yielding benefits for individuals and the population? As a point of comparison, the DNA biobank in the United Kingdom has a participation rate of 10% to date.
Reluctance to participate in a DNA biobank may reflect concerns about the potential for such information to lead to genetic discrimination that might affect a person’s ability to get a job or be covered by health insurance. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, currently being considered by Congress to prevent such discrimination, may be a crucial step in helping to ease public fears about participation in DNA biobanks, and about genetic testing overall.
Respondents’ attitudes about DNA biobank participation were related to their attitudes about genetic testing even when effective treatment does not exist. Those who want genetic tests despite a lack of current effective treatment options may have more optimism about future medical breakthroughs. They may hold greater hope that their – and their children’s – participation in a DNA biobank can contribute to individual benefits and collective advances in medical care.
For Americans who are more reluctant about genetic tests and DNA biobanks, concerns about privacy and uncertainty of genetic test results may outweigh the benefits they perceive for themselves and their families. Another consideration is that broad introduction of genetic testing into general clinical care will require careful selection of tests, quality control of tests available to the public, and education of patients and health care providers about interpretation of results.
This report presents findings from a nationally representative household survey conducted exclusively by Knowledge Networks, Inc, for C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital. The survey was administered from March 14-26, 2007, to a randomly selected, stratified group of adults aged 18 and older (n=2,076) with and without children from the Knowledge Networks standing panel that closely resembles the U.S. population. The sample was subsequently weighted to reflect U.S. population figures from the Census Bureau. The response rate was 73% among Knowledge Networks panel members contacted to participate.
C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health
Director: Matthew M. Davis, MD, MAPP
Associate Director: Sarah J. Clark, MPH
Manager & Editor: Dianne C. Singer, MPH
Collaborating Faculty: Beth A. Tarini, MD, MS
This Report includes research findings from the C.S. Mott Children's National Poll on Children's Health, which do not represent the opinions of the investigators or the opinions of the University of Michigan. The University of Michigan reserves all rights over this material.