Pay-to-play continues to cost families of student athletes

You are here

March 17, 2016
Kids playing soccer

School budget challenges have resulted in deep funding cuts for middle and high school sports. Many school districts now charge “pay-to-play” fees for student athletes. These fees are a flat charge per year or per number of sports but parents often pay additional fees as well, for things like equipment and transportation.

In a 2012 NPCH Report, nearly 1 in 5 parents in lower-income households reported a decrease in their child’s school sports participation due to cost. Only one-third of lower-income parents reported that their child participated in school sports, while more than half of higher-income parents had a teen playing a school sport. Over 60% of children who play school sports had an athletic pay-to-play fee.

Figure 1. Participation in School Sports for Kids 12-17 Years, by Household Income

View full size image | View more health infographics

Recently, the Michigan High School Athletic Association released the results of their 2014-2015 Participation Fee Survey. According to their survey, 51% of the responding schools reported requiring a participation fee for their athletes, up from 41% last year. Out of those schools, 97% said this was not their first time requiring a fee.

What do you think?
Should schools require a participation fee for student athletes? What about for other extra-curricular programs offered by the school? Share your thoughts in the comments and on Facebook and Twitter @MottNPCH.
 

 

Add new comment